Exploring the Consequences of Non-Registred Crimes and Impact on Criminal Justice System

  • Anil Mavarkar, Dr G.S. Venumadhava


Criminal insights' historical backdrop bears declaration to a quest for a proportion of "culpability" among populations. This article drove progressively to a concern about the "dark figure" of crime. About events that by specific measures are called crime yet that are not enrolled in whatever organisation's measurements were the wellspring of the utilised information. Fighting arguments emerged about the non-registered crimes between the "pragmatists" who underlined the ideals of fulfilment with which information address the "genuine crime" that happens and the "institutionalists" who stress that crime can have substantial importance just regarding coordinated, authentic social reactions to it. This paper inspects these contentions regarding police and study insights as proportions of crime in a populace. It reasons that in investigating the dark figure of crime, the essential inquiry isn't its amount getting uncovered yet any arrangement of crime insights, including study research, includes some evaluative, institutional handling of individuals' reports. Ideas, definitions, quantitative models, and hypotheses should be changed according to how the information is not some equitably observable universe of "criminal acts," but instead those occasions characterised, caught, and prepared as such by some institutional instrument.